If you are facing the emotional and legal challenges of a medical malpractice case, you may be feeling confused, overwhelmed, and unsure of what to expect. At times like this, you need someone who can guide you through the complex process, helping you understand your rights while fighting for justice on your behalf. If you are considering pursuing a medical malpractice lawsuit in Georgia, it’s essential to know that there are common defenses used by the parties involved. Understanding these defenses will prepare you for what lies ahead and help you make informed decisions about your case.
What is Medical Malpractice and Why Do Defendants Use Defenses
Medical malpractice occurs when a healthcare professional, such as a doctor, nurse, or hospital, fails to provide a standard of care that is expected in the medical community, causing harm to a patient. These cases often involve serious injuries or even death, making the stakes incredibly high. The defendant, typically the healthcare provider or institution, will likely try to defend themselves against these accusations in various ways. They may argue that their actions were not negligent or that the harm caused to the patient was not a direct result of their actions.
Understanding these defenses is important because it can help you prepare for the kind of legal arguments the other side may raise. It’s not uncommon for defendants in medical malpractice cases to present these defenses to avoid liability or reduce the amount of damages they must pay. By knowing what to expect, you can better navigate the process and protect your rights.
The “No Negligence” Defense
One of the most common defenses used in medical malpractice lawsuits is the argument that there was no negligence involved in the treatment. This defense is often at the core of a medical malpractice case. Essentially, the defendant will claim that their actions were in line with the medical standards that are commonly accepted by other professionals in the field. In many cases, defendants argue that they followed established protocols and made the best possible decision based on the information they had at the time.
For example, a doctor may claim that the diagnosis they provided was reasonable given the symptoms presented by the patient. They may argue that their care was appropriate under the circumstances, and that the injury or harm the patient suffered was not the result of any wrongdoing or negligence.
Adam Princenthal
Attorney At Law
David May
Attorney At Law
Matthew Wilson
Attorney At Law
To counter this defense, you will need solid evidence that shows how the healthcare professional deviated from accepted standards of care, leading to harm. This is where an experienced medical malpractice attorney can play a crucial role in gathering evidence, working with medical specialists, and ensuring that your case is presented effectively.
The “Informed Consent” Defense
Another common defense is the argument of informed consent. In this defense, the defendant argues that the patient was fully informed about the risks and possible complications of the medical procedure or treatment and gave their consent before the procedure was performed. According to this defense, if the patient was aware of the potential risks and complications, the healthcare provider cannot be held liable for any negative outcomes that resulted from the treatment.
While this defense can be valid in some situations, it is often contested. If a healthcare provider failed to fully inform the patient or did not disclose all potential risks, they may not be able to successfully use this defense. This is particularly true if the patient did not fully understand the risks or was not provided with all necessary information to make an informed decision.
Your legal team can help demonstrate that informed consent was not properly obtained and that the risks were not properly explained to you, which could strengthen your case.
After a car accident, I contacted David May at the Lagrange office. He, and his staff, helped me with medical advice and follow up doctors visits, along with dealing with my insurance and the insurance of the woman that hit me. I have been very pleased with the service I received from David May and the Lagrange staff. They are warm and open, always there to help with advice and answer questions.”
- Debau
I highly recommend Adam Princenthal .I was looking for someone with years of experience in personal injury.They needed to be knowledgeable, transparent and honest.I wanted to know I was dealing directly with the lawyer I hired.Adam Princenthal could answer all the difficult questions and phone calls were returned.Adam got the settlement I was looking for in a timely manner."
- Nancy K.
I am glad that I was referred to Princenthal & May. Matthew met with me and gained my trust with the case. I was never left in the dark on any matters, My phone calls were either answered or returned quickly. The office staff are very friendly as well. My case was settled, with both Matthew and Adam present. Both are very professional in their work.. They work for you !!!"
- Jacque Minor
The “Pre-Existing Condition” Defense
In some medical malpractice cases, the defendant may argue that the injuries or harm the patient suffered were due to a pre-existing medical condition rather than any mistake or negligence on the part of the healthcare provider. This defense aims to shift the blame away from the defendant by showing that the patient’s condition was the result of something unrelated to the medical treatment they received.
For example, a healthcare provider may argue that the patient’s symptoms were caused by a chronic illness or an underlying medical condition that existed before the alleged malpractice occurred. They may claim that the patient’s condition would have worsened regardless of the treatment or procedure.
In these cases, the burden of proof is on the defendant to show that the injury or harm was related to the pre-existing condition and not to any medical error. Your legal team will need to gather evidence to refute this defense and demonstrate that the healthcare provider’s actions directly caused or worsened your condition.
The “Good Faith Effort” Defense
The “good faith effort” defense is sometimes used by healthcare providers to argue that they acted in the best interests of the patient, even if the outcome was not ideal. In this defense, the defendant admits that they may have made a mistake or error but claims that they did so while trying to provide the best care possible.
While this defense may seem reasonable, it does not necessarily absolve the healthcare provider of liability. In Georgia, medical malpractice laws require that the defendant’s actions meet a certain standard of care, and simply acting in good faith is not enough to avoid liability if the care was inadequate or harmful.
To challenge this defense, your attorney will need to demonstrate that the defendant’s actions did not meet the necessary standard of care, regardless of their intentions. This can often involve testimony and a detailed review of the medical records to show that the provider’s actions fell short of what was required.
Related Videos
Hiring a Personal Injury Attorney
How Long Will a Personal Injury Case Take?
The Statute of Limitations Defense
Another defense commonly used in medical malpractice cases is the statute of limitations. In Georgia, there is a limited time period during which you can file a medical malpractice lawsuit. If the lawsuit is filed after this time period has expired, the defendant may use this defense to have the case dismissed.
The statute of limitations for medical malpractice claims in Georgia is typically two years from the date of the alleged injury or from when the injury was discovered, although there are some exceptions to this rule. It is important to consult with an attorney as soon as possible to ensure that your case is filed within the appropriate time frame and that you do not lose your opportunity for justice.
Representative Cases
Facing a medical malpractice lawsuit in Georgia can be a challenging and emotionally taxing experience. The legal process can be complex, and the defense strategies employed by the healthcare provider may seem overwhelming. However, understanding these common defenses is essential for anyone pursuing a medical malpractice case. By knowing what to expect, you can better prepare yourself for the legal battle ahead.
If you or a loved one has been a victim of medical malpractice, it is crucial to seek the help of an experienced attorney who can guide you through the process and help you secure a successful case result. At Princenthal, May & Wilson, LLC, we are dedicated to helping you navigate the complexities of medical malpractice law with compassion and determination. We understand the emotional and physical toll these cases can take, and we are here to fight for the justice you deserve. Please reach out to us today to discuss your case and take the first step toward holding those responsible accountable.
